“Music, of all the liberal arts, has the greatest influence over the passions, and it is that to which the legislator ought to give the greatest encouragement.”
Napoleon Bonaparte
To read other Quotations of the Week click here.
“Music, of all the liberal arts, has the greatest influence over the passions, and it is that to which the legislator ought to give the greatest encouragement.”
Napoleon Bonaparte
To read other Quotations of the Week click here.
By Roger Crane
Jazz and pop, no matter how symbiotic their relationship, never lodge at the same inn too long. Although related, Jazz is not pop. The music called jazz is not popular music for that is not the intent. Sure, jazz artists wish to make a living, and hopefully a good living, but the honest ones do not “water down” their music to appeal to the masses. In fact, most jazz players wouldn’t even know how, for — as the cliche goes — “you don’t choose jazz, it chooses you.” Unlike pop, much jazz is a demanding virtuoso music. In fact, the type of jazz known as “bop” is surely the most virtuoso music ever to take root in the American vernacular, just as rock music is very likely the most elemental.
Unlike most popular music, jazz requires great skill and that is why many jazz artists can play effective classical music, although most classical players cannot play convincing jazz. Their performance may be perfectly executed but the jazz component of the chosen piece is lost, since very few classical musicians can generate the momentum we call “swing.” Classical music is a composer’s art. Even the record stores reflect this fact by organizing the CDs via composer name (Bach to Wagner, for instance). But jazz is a performer’s art and we find the CDs arranged by performer name (Armstrong to Zeitlin, for instance).
Why the emphasis on this seemingly minor point? Well, because, when one listens to jazz, we are not listening to hear Carmichael and Gershwin melodies as composed, we are listening for a jazz artist’s interpretation. The best jazz musicians not only know what they are doing, but do it with a unique voice. We expect the unexpected, the utterly illuminating.
In his notes for the art portfolio “Jazz,” noted French artist Henri Matisse quotes his fellow painter Auguste Renoir as having said, “When I have
arranged a bouquet, in order to paint it, I go around to the side that I have not looked at.” In a sense, that is what great jazz musicians do when they interpret a piece of musical material, whether it’s a Gershwin ballad, a composed blues, or an original composition. Jazz musicians are especially adept at “going around to the side they have not looked at. ”Their intention is always to say something musically interesting about a piece by revealing a facet of it that is not readily obvious – and to do so spontaneously, by improvisation. And the best ones do that with a voice and style as unmistakably their own as is the artistic style of Matisse, or Renoir, or Van Gogh. The great jazz writer Whitney Balliett once observed that “Jazz is the art of surprise.” Note that word, he did not say that jazz is the art of recognition – rather, surprise and that surprise often derives from seeing that “other side.” Thus, unlike most pop, we can say that jazz is “idea” music and a sophisticated listener is anticipating and listening to hear those “other side” ideas.
Also, unlike most popular music, at the heart of jazz lies the improvisation of all three music components: melody, harmony and rhythm, which implies freshness, originality and, at its best, enchantment. In fact, the better jazz performers “write” new songs with every chorus they play. Whether alchemizing songs from the Great American Songbook or illuminating some shopworn old blues, they are songwriters as surely as Gershwin. “Tell your story” a jazz fan sometimes shouts out and indeed the jazz artists do. A popular artist tells a story too, of course, but he is telling the composer’s story, very often one that the audience already knows and wishes to hear again. Thus, pop music also tends to be a composer’s music, whereas, as noted, jazz is a performer’s music that reflects his or her ideas.
Admittedly, displays of technique can quickly wear thin in the world of jazz improvising. How many rapid arpeggios, scales and runs can the listener’s mind absorb — or care to absorb. Admiring technique for technique’s sake is a short-term satisfaction. All it really shows us is that the player knows his instrument but doesn’t show us that he has heart. The best jazz artists play music not notes and you can be a technical wizard and not make any music. The improvisation, the technique should always be in service to the music. When the piece subsides we should not be saying “Man, can that guy play!” we should be saying “Man, that piece was beautiful (or exciting, or both)!” The very best jazz artists can often play only a simple phrase and melt every heart in the room. The famous trumpeter, Harry “Sweets” Edison had that ability, as did saxophonist Lester Young and his friend, vocalist Billie Holiday.
For the very reasons noted above jazz, unlike pop, is a minority art. As the saying goes, it takes “good ears” to appreciate it and thus jazz is not for everybody. Except for the big band/Swing era when good music was popular and popular music was good, the popularity of jazz is usually down in the single digits. Rock is performed in packed stadiums with flashing lights, smoke and mirrors. Jazz is performed in a corner of a restaurant or hotel lobby, often with a dozen or less patrons. The jazz community is confined and intimate and thus the followers tend to bond and to know one another. If a jazz artist does become popular, he is often looked upon by the cognoscenti with suspicion. “Aha, he sold out” might be the cry. The very people who claim to love jazz are often the ones who secretly do not want it to have a large audience, since that would vitiate their claim to special perception. True, popularity and quality are separate attributes, but occasionally they do reside together. For instance, despite his popularity, the great Louis Armstrong never “sold out.”
Jazz is many things: it is exciting, it is challenging (and even prickly), it is often elegant. The best jazz artists are making our world “new.” That is, they are overcoming the deadening effects of habit and our perceptions and allowing us to hear with new ears. Unlike rock — and all of its various cousins (rap, hip-hop, etc) — jazz requires we patrons to meet the performers half way and to actively Listen. (Yes, the capital L is intended).
To read more of Roger Crane’s reviews and articles check out his website, The Song Scout.
By Tony Gieske
The myriad kudos Ron King has collected saluting his work as one of the town’s greatest professional trumpet players were nowhere in evidence on the bandstand at Charlie O’s Saturday night. There was not so much as a T-shirt.
He got right down to business with a strange black plastic mute in his horn and a mellow ballad coming out, although without the customary overtones that give the sound a dusty surface. His usual perch as lead trumpet in a recording orchestra gives him a magisterial perspective on the melody.
King’s improvisational output, however, seemed coldly efficient, however brilliantly decorated with impossibly swift and wide gruppeti, which are turns; huge skips from top to bottom and back again in the blink of an eye; and spectacular slides into third base.
The well-chosen rhythm section brought welcome vivacity to the classic number “Sister Sadie.” King got to swinging pretty good on this one, not all that much of a feat on a great Horace Silver head. And with Lorca Hart, drums; Jimmy Cox, piano, and the extraordinary Brandino on bass, the forward motion was unstoppable here, as it was on the up-tempo successors “Perdido” and a Woody Shaw original.
Yet I listened in vain for a little bebop from the leader, or a few blues licks. It was just one miraculous technical feat after another, a truly impressive recital of brass-playing skill and power. With an exception: Very skinny above the staff, he was.
Cox knew his bebop quite well and improvisational riches flowed from his keyboard, fresh and authoritative. Brandino, whose usual credit is Kevin Brandon, has backed Justin Timberlake, Mary J. Blige, Beyonce and Stevie Wonder on some recent Grammy contenders, among other distinguished gigs. He knows just what to do, no matter where, what or when, bebop or not, and Hart partnered him flawlessly.
By Don Heckman
Strunz and Farah have been around for so long that it can be easy to take them for granted. The two-guitar partnership of Costa Rican-born Jorge Strunz and Iranian native Ardeshir Farah reaches back to their first CD, Mosaico, released in 1980. And their three-decade musical relationship (lasting longer than many marriages) has positioned them as one of the original, as well as one of the continually prominent ensembles, in the World Music genre.
The reasons for that remarkable career longevity were on full display in their performance at Vibrato Grill Jazz…etc. on Tuesday night. There was, first of all, the utterly symbiotic relationship between their guitars. Both affirmed their virtuosic skills, tossing off incredibly rapid-fire melodic lines with almost casual ease. Their compositional offerings ranged confidently from Latin American dance beats and new flamenco to Middle Eastern rhythms and scales, with occasional glances in the direction of klezmer.
Every note was ably supported by the stellar playing of flutist/clarinetist Rob Hardt, bassist Carlitos del Puerto and percussionist Jimmy Branly.
Highlights came one after the other. Strunz generally claimed a somewhat larger share of the spotlight, ripping through one solo after another with finger-burning speed. Despite the amazing rapidity, however, his improvising always offered even more, via melodic phrasing and driving rhythms. Farah’s solos were equally dynamic, and his enthusiastic presence, constantly interacting with the other players, helped spark the evening’s musical pyrotechnics.
In a new piece titled “Rattle Tattle,” clarinetist Hardt – a vital participant throughout the evening – stepped forward with a stunning solo, power-mixing elements of Eastern European klezmer with propulsive jazz phrasing. Another work, “Caspian Night,” showcased Hardt’s flute in an evocative Middle Eastern setting. Regardless of the musical orientation, Branly – playing cajon, bongos and cymbals in smiling, high-spirited fashion – joined with the always dependable, driving bass of del Puerto to keep the music firmly on track.
There have been times in the past when Vibrato’s audiences have been more attentive to the venue’s fine cuisine and their own socializing than to the music. But not so on this night. Strunz, Farah and their players fully claimed the responsiveness of the full house crowd. And with good cause. Thirty years together have only enhanced the musical appeal of this insistently creative duo.
Photos by Faith Frenz
By Don Heckman
Pat Metheny’s Orchestrion tour arrived at Disney Hall Monday night. And one couldn’t have asked for a more amiable setting than Frank Gehry’s architecturally unique performance space. The stage was filled with the Orchestrion’s clusters and stacks of instruments – from a grand piano, marimbas and acoustic guitars to cymbals, percussion and bottle organs – their visual impact enhanced by the dramatic overhead presence of Disney’s seemingly scattered organ pipes.
The dozens of sound-producing entities – driven by various solenoids and valves, controlled by computer sequencing as well as real-time triggering – represent the latest, and far and away the most expansive, manifestation of Metheny’s continuing enhancement of his creative musical palette. Triggered by his fascination with his grandfather’s player piano, the Orchestrion is a contemporary version of the wide variety of mechanical instruments that came into popularity around the beginning of the 20th century. But, although similar in the sense that it consists of physical, sound-producing devices, it is fundamentally different in that the sounds produced by each of those devices is the product of human hands – Metheny’s.
The actual participation of the Orchestrion in the program took several numbers to arrive. Metheny began with a few solo pieces, switching to his 42-string Pikasso guitar for one, perhaps intending its sweeps and glissandos of sound to serve as a kind of transition. But, even so, his initial interaction with the Orchestrion was relatively modest, involving a back-beat from a pair of finger cymbals and his solo guitar version of “Unity Village,” from his first album.
When the full panoply of sounds kicked in, accompanied by flashing lights and the visual images of hammers striking and keys depressing, the effect was dramatic enough to generate a roar of approval from the crowd. And, over the course of the five movements of the “Orchestrion Suite,” the combination of Metheny’s guitar and his lush, far-ranging composition thoroughly affirmed the physical, financial and creative efforts he has put into the project.
More problematically, however, the implicit limitations of the Orchestrion – the pre-set sequencing, the fact that all the sounds are the product of single person – made for an absence of spontaneity that was underscored when Metheny was joined for a guitar duet segment with Brazilian guitarist Romero Lubambo. Performing Jobim’s “Insensatez” together, one immediately sensed a feeling of rhythmic lift – call it “swing” – that never quite seemed to surface in the Orchestrion’s passages.
Nonetheless, viewing the project from the perspective of Metheny’s desire to create a live musical entity in which every element is the product of his own imagination, the performance had to be considered a success. The music, of course, is always what matters. At its best, the “Suite,” with Metheny’s always compelling guitar soaring freely in and out of the Orchestrion’s multi-leveled textures, was a work reaching beyond the limits of genre. And perhaps even more interestingly, a work with the potential to reach beyond the framework of the Orchestrion.